Contents
Why proof has become the central issue
With the telemarketing reform, which took effect on 11 August 2026, the question is no longer "is this number on an opt-out list?" but "can we show that this person agreed to be called?". The burden of proof rests with the business, and the law also covers calls made by a third party acting on its behalf. The general framework is set out in our guide to the French telemarketing law and its effects in Morocco.
For a Moroccan centre, the consequence is operational: every campaign must rely on a verifiable evidence register, and every call must be traceable to an entry in that register.
What valid consent must contain
The French Consumer Code and Decree No. 2026-662 set five cumulative requirements:
- A clear affirmative act: ticking an empty box, clicking a dedicated button, answering "yes" to an explicit question. Silence and pre-ticked boxes are excluded.
- Freely given: consent cannot be a condition for buying a product or service.
- Specific and informed: it names the business that will call and the purpose of the calls.
- Recent: it is valid for one year at most.
- Revocable: the person can withdraw it at any time, and the withdrawal must be acted on.
The evidence register: minimum fields
| Field | Why | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Person identifier and phone number | Link the proof to the call | Number normalised to international format |
| Named business | Required by the decree | Trading name of the brand, not "our partners" |
| Purpose of the calls | Required by the decree | « Offres d'assurance habitation » ("Home insurance offers") |
| Date and time of consent | Calculate the one-year validity | Server time stamp, with time zone stated |
| Channel and medium | Demonstrate the affirmative act | Web form, recorded inbound call, point of sale |
| Exact text presented | Show that consent was informed | Version of the form or script, with its number |
| Technical record of the act | Prove that it came from the person | Screenshot of the ticked box, IP address, recording of the verbal agreement |
| Source of the list | Trace the chain back in the event of a dispute | Brand's website, named partner, event |
| Date of any withdrawal | Stop the calls | Time stamp and channel of the withdrawal |
| Calculated expiry date | Block calls automatically | Date of consent plus one year |
These records are themselves personal data: access to them must be restricted and their retention governed. They must be kept for at least three years, a period that has to be reconciled with the applicable data protection rules.
Sources of consent and their risks
| Source | Risk level | Point to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Form on the brand's website, dedicated unticked box | Low | Keep the version of the form and the record of the ticked box |
| Inbound call where the customer agrees to be called back about other offers | Low to medium | Explicit question, recorded answer, brand and purpose stated |
| List bought from a lead supplier | High | Does the consent name the brand? Does the supplier provide individual proof? |
| Co-registration with a list of "partners" | High | A generic list makes it hard to meet the requirement to name the business |
| Consent collected more than a year ago | Unusable | Block the call; a call made to seek fresh consent would itself, in all likelihood, be telemarketing without consent |
One question to put to every list supplier: "Can you send me, for a number picked at random, the complete proof of consent within 48 hours?" A supplier that cannot do so shifts the risk onto the centre and its client.
Collecting consent during an inbound call
An inbound call is a legitimate source, provided it is explicit. Example wording to adapt, in French for French customers:
« Accepteriez-vous que [Marque] vous rappelle pour vous présenter ses offres d'assurance habitation ? Votre accord est valable un an et vous pouvez le retirer à tout moment en nous le disant ou en écrivant à [adresse]. » ("Would you agree to [Brand] calling you back to present its home insurance offers? Your agreement is valid for one year and you can withdraw it at any time by telling us or by writing to [address].")
The agent records the answer in the CRM, the call recording serves as the record, and the expiry date is calculated automatically. The question must be asked after the customer's request has been dealt with, never as a condition for dealing with it.
Before every call: the checks to automate
- Check that proof of consent exists for this number and this brand.
- Check that the purpose of the campaign matches the purpose consented to.
- Check that the consent is less than a year old and has not been withdrawn.
- Where there is no consent, check whether the call falls under an exception (existing contract, press subscription) or is a callback requested less than five working days ago.
- Check that the sector is not one closed to telemarketing even with consent.
- Check French calling hours and the cap of four calls in 30 days.
- Log the check, its result and the identifier of the proof used.
These checks are a matter of privacy by design: they must be built into the dialler, not left to the agent's judgement.
When the consumer asks for the proof
The decree provides that the proof must be made available to the consumer. The centre and its client must therefore define in advance who responds, within what time frame and in what form: an extract from the register showing the date, channel, brand, purpose and text presented. A quick, clear answer often defuses the complaint; no answer fuels it. It is also a useful indicator of customer relationship quality.
On the Moroccan side: prospecting Moroccan consumers
For campaigns targeting people in Morocco, Law 09-08 on personal data protection applies. According to the CNDP's (Morocco's data protection authority) fact sheet on prospecting, Article 10 requires prior consent for prospecting by automated calling machine, fax or email, with an exception for products or services similar to those of a previous sale. Every message must offer a free and simple means of objecting. Keeping proof of consent remains the best answer in the event of a CNDP inspection.
Implementation checklist
- Define the register template with the fields above.
- Audit active lists and set aside those without compliant proof.
- Have list suppliers sign an undertaking to provide individual proof, subject to audit.
- Rewrite collection forms and scripts: brand, purpose, duration, withdrawal.
- Connect the automated checks to the dialler.
- Set the archiving period at three years or more and secure access.
- Set up the procedure for responding to requests for proof.
- Document everything for client audits.
Further reading
- 7 min read
- 7 min read
- 7 min read
- 4 min read
Frequently asked questions
Who must prove that the consumer consented to telemarketing?
The business. Since 11 August 2026, the burden of proving consent has rested with it. When a call centre calls on behalf of a brand, the brand remains responsible and in practice requires the centre to be able to produce proof for every number called.
How long must proof of consent be kept?
For at least three years under Decree No. 2026-662 of 23 July 2026, and it must be possible to make it available to the consumer. The consent itself is valid for one year at most.
Is consent given to "partners" valid?
It is risky. The decree requires the consent to name the business and the purpose of the calls. A generic wording referring to unnamed partners makes it hard to show that the person agreed to be called by the brand concerned.
Is a pre-ticked box on a form enough?
No. Consent must result from a clear affirmative act; silence and pre-ticked boxes do not count as consent. The proof must therefore show that the person ticked or confirmed the option themselves.
Is consent needed to call back a customer who asked for it?
A callback made within five working days of the consumer's request is not telemarketing under the 2026 decree. The time stamp of the request must nonetheless be kept in order to demonstrate this.
General information, not legal advice.
Report an errorReferences (5)
- DGCCRF (the French consumer authority), telemarketing is now prohibited if you have not consented to it. (opens in a new tab)
- Décret n° 2026-662 du 23 juillet 2026 relatif au démarchage téléphonique (Decree No. 2026-662 of 23 July 2026 on telemarketing), Official Journal of the French Republic.
- Actu-Juridique, « Réforme du démarchage téléphonique : mise en pratique depuis le 11 août 2026 ». (opens in a new tab)
- CMS, « Interdiction prochaine du démarchage téléphonique sans consentement préalable du consommateur ». (opens in a new tab)
- CNDP, practical fact sheet on commercial prospecting, 2025. (opens in a new tab)
